The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), is mental health professionals' primary diagnostic tool in the United States. It includes definitions and diagnostic criteria for a wide range of mental disorders.

Motor disorders are a category of neurodevelopmental disorders in the DSM-5, and they primarily pertain to problems in the acquisition and execution of coordinated motor skills. The primary disorders under this category include:

• Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD): Formerly known as "clumsy child syndrome," individuals with DCD demonstrate a significant impairment in the acquisition and execution of coordinated motor skills. These difficulties can affect activities of daily living like tying shoes, buttoning shirts, or using utensils. It is not due to a general medical condition, such as cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, or a neurological disorder.
• Stereotypic Movement Disorder: This disorder involves repetitive, seemingly driven, and non-functional motor behaviors (e.g., hand flapping, body rocking, head banging, self-biting). The behavior interferes with daily activities or causes injury. This disorder can be with or without self-injurious behavior.
• Tic Disorders: These include motor or vocal tics that are sudden, rapid, recurrent, non-rhythmic, and stereotyped. The tic disorders listed under the DSM-5 are:
• Tourette’s Disorder: Both multiple motor and vocal tics are present, though not necessarily concurrently, for more than one year since the first tic onset.
• Persistent (Chronic) Motor or Vocal Tic Disorder: Motor or vocal tics are present, but not both, for more than one year since the first tic onset.
• Provisional Tic Disorder: Both motor and vocal tics are present, but the duration since the first tic onset has been less than one year.

It is important to note that while these disorders are categorized under motor disorders, they can overlap with other conditions and syndromes.

Diagnostic Criteria

Motor disorders encompass a variety of neurodevelopmental disorders that predominantly affect motor functioning and skills. Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is characterized by significant difficulties in acquiring and performing tasks that require motor coordination, given the individual's chronological age and opportunities for skill learning and use. These motor skill deficits must significantly interfere with academic achievements or activities of daily living and not be better explained by intellectual disability or visual impairment (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2023).

Stereotypic Movement Disorder involves repetitive, seemingly driven, and non-functional motor behaviors. The repetitive movements can interfere with everyday activities or lead to self-injury. The diagnosis is made when these behaviors are not better explained by a compulsion (as in obsessive-compulsive disorder), a tic (as in a tic disorder), or by substance use or another medical condition (APA, 2013).

Tic Disorders, on the other hand, are characterized by sudden, rapid, and non-rhythmic motor movements or vocalizations. Within this category, Tourette’s Disorder is diagnosed when an individual has both multiple motor tics and at least one vocal tic, persisting for more than a year. Persistent (Chronic) Motor or Vocal Tic Disorder is distinguished by either motor or vocal tics, but not both. Provisional Tic Disorder involves motor and vocal tics but lasts less than one year since onset. It is crucial to note that tics should not be attributable to substances or another medical condition (APA, 2023).

In the context of diagnostic criteria and classification, it is essential to recognize that these disorders are not merely categorical entities but are more dimensional, with symptom severity and impact varying across individuals.

The Impacts

Motor disorders, as classified by the DSM-5-TR, can have a broad range of impacts on an individual's functioning across various domains, such as physical, social, academic, and psychological.

Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) has been associated with various adverse outcomes. Physically, children with DCD may struggle with tasks that their peers find straightforward, like tying shoelaces, using utensils, or participating in sports (Blank et al., 2012). These challenges can, in turn, contribute to reduced participation in physical activities, leading to poorer physical fitness and a higher risk of obesity (Cairney et al., 2005). Academically, difficulties in motor coordination can translate to problems with handwriting, leading to reduced academic performance (Rosenblum, 2006). Socially, children with DCD often experience lower self-esteem, increased rates of peer victimization, and social isolation (Poulsen et al., 2007). Additionally, there is a higher risk of mental health problems, including anxiety and depression (Sigurdsson et al., 2002).

Stereotypic Movement Disorder can have physical repercussions, mainly when the repetitive movements result in self-harm. Psychologically, it may cause distress, with the affected individuals possibly becoming self-conscious about their behaviors. These repetitive behaviors can also interfere with everyday activities or even result in restrictions, such as needing protective equipment to prevent self-injury (Thomsen, 2016).

For those with Tic Disorders, the involuntary nature of tics can lead to embarrassment, frustration, or social stigmatization. The repetitive movements or vocalizations can disrupt classroom settings, leading to academic challenges. Moreover, individuals with tics frequently face co-occurring conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), which can further compound their challenges (Cohen & Leckman, 1999). Additionally, they may face increased rates of mood and anxiety disorders due to the chronic nature of the condition (Storch et al., 2007).

Though primarily characterized by motor symptoms, motor disorders have multidimensional impacts beyond physical difficulties. Comprehensive interventions that address these varied challenges are essential for affected individuals to achieve their optimal potential.

The Etiology (Origins and Causes)

As defined in the DSM-5, motor disorders originate from genetic, neurobiological, and environmental factors. While the precise origins and causes remain a subject of extensive research, several theories and findings have gained consensus.

While Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) 's exact cause is unknown, several hypotheses exist regarding its etiology. Neuroimaging studies have suggested that children with DCD may have brain structure and function alterations, specifically in areas related to motor control and planning (Zwicker et al., 2012). Genetic factors may also play a role, with some studies indicating that DCD can run in families (Martin et al., 2006). Additionally, prenatal and perinatal factors such as low birth weight and prematurity have been associated with an increased risk of DCD (Goyen & Lui, 2009).

The etiology of Stereotypic Movement Disorder is also multifaceted. It can be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly autism spectrum disorder (Tan et al., 2011). These movements sometimes respond to environmental factors, including stress or a restrictive environment. Additionally, brain injuries or alterations, especially those affecting the basal ganglia, can contribute to the onset of stereotypic movements (Thomsen, 2016).

Tic Disorders, including Tourette's syndrome, have a clear genetic component, with first-degree relatives of affected individuals demonstrating a higher risk of developing tics (Pauls et al., 2014). Neuroimaging studies have implicated the cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuitry in the pathophysiology of tic disorders (Peterson et al., 2003). Moreover, environmental factors like infections have been hypothesized to contribute to the onset or exacerbation of tics in a subset of individuals, a concept known as PANDAS (Pediatric et al. Associated with Streptococcal infections) (Swedo et al., 1998).

In conclusion, the etiologies of motor disorders are complex, involving a combination of genetic, neurobiological, and environmental factors. Continued research into these disorders is crucial to elucidate their origins further and develop more effective interventions.

Comorbidities

Motor disorders often do not exist in isolation, and many individuals with these conditions experience comorbidities or co-occurring disorders. These comorbidities can compound individuals' challenges and complicate the diagnostic and therapeutic processes.

Many comorbid conditions for Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) have been frequently observed. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common co-occurring disorders with DCD, with estimates suggesting that up to half of those with DCD may also have symptoms of ADHD (Kadesjö & Gillberg, 1999). Additionally, children with DCD are at an elevated risk for learning disabilities, especially in reading and mathematics (Kirby et al., 2008). From a socio-emotional perspective, these children often exhibit higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms, which can stem from the challenges and frustrations they experience daily (Caçola, 2016).

Stereotypic Movement Disorder frequently coexists with other neurodevelopmental disorders. It is particularly prevalent in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD); many repetitive behaviors observed in ASD, such as hand-flapping or rocking, overlap with those seen in Stereotypic Movement Disorder (Bodfish et al., 2000). Additionally, it is not uncommon to find this disorder in individuals with intellectual disabilities or sensory impairments.

In the realm of Tic Disorders, comorbidities abound. ADHD is a frequent co-occurring condition, with a significant proportion of those with Tourette's Syndrome also manifesting symptoms of ADHD (Freeman et al., 2000). Moreover, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and obsessive-compulsive behaviors are often observed alongside tic disorders, particularly Tourette's (Leckman et al., 1997). Furthermore, individuals with tic disorders may experience higher rates of anxiety and mood disorders and challenges with impulse control.

In conclusion, motor disorders are frequently associated with many comorbid conditions. These co-occurring disorders highlight the necessity for comprehensive assessment and a holistic approach to intervention, addressing not only the motor symptoms but also the coexisting conditions that may affect an individual's overall well-being.

Risk Factors

Motor disorders present a multifaceted clinical picture influenced by genetic, environmental, and neurobiological factors. Several risk factors have been identified that increase the likelihood of developing these disorders.

For Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), prenatal and perinatal factors are significant risk determinants. Premature birth, low birth weight, and complications during birth have all been associated with an increased risk of DCD (Goyen & Lui, 2009). A family history of DCD or related motor difficulties can also elevate the risk, suggesting a potential genetic component (Martin et al., 2006). Males appear more frequently diagnosed with DCD than females, making gender another risk factor (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

In the context of Stereotypic Movement Disorder, a coexisting neurodevelopmental disorder, especially Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), heightens the risk (Bodfish et al., 2000). Intellectual disabilities, sensory impairments, and traumatic brain injuries are other contributing risk factors (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Furthermore, certain environmental factors, like being in a restrictive or unstimulating environment, can also contribute to the onset of the disorder (Thomsen, 2016).

For Tic Disorders, there is a strong genetic predisposition. A first-degree relative with a tic disorder substantially increases the risk (Pauls et al., 2014). Prenatal and perinatal adversities, such as maternal smoking during pregnancy or complications during birth, have also been implicated as risk factors (Mathews et al., 2006). Additionally, male gender has been identified as a risk factor, with males being more commonly affected than females (Robertson, 2008).

Recognizing these risks is essential for early identification and intervention, which can significantly benefit affected individuals by enhancing their quality of life and functional outcomes.

Recent Psychology Research Findings

Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered patterns of brain connectivity in individuals with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). Specifically, recent research has highlighted differences in white matter structures and functional connectivity, suggesting that disruptions in the communication between key brain regions might underlie some of the motor coordination difficulties seen in DCD (Langevin et al., 2019).

Growing evidence suggests that early interventions in tic disorders, especially behavioral interventions, can significantly reduce tic severity and improve overall life quality. Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT) has emerged as an effective non-pharmacological treatment, with recent studies highlighting its benefits in younger populations (McGuire et al., 2020).

Beyond genetic and neurobiological factors, there is increasing attention on the role of environmental factors in Stereotypic Movement Disorder. Recent research has found that children in more restrictive or under-stimulating environments are at an elevated risk, reinforcing the importance of a nurturing environment for children's developmental health (Jones et al., 2021).

Recent studies have delved deeper into why males seem more frequently affected by certain motor disorders than females. While the exact reasons remain elusive, hormonal factors, genetic differences, and sociocultural factors are all explored as potential explanations (Smith et al., 2021).

As more research underscores the frequent co-occurrence of motor disorders with other conditions, there is a growing interest in understanding how these comorbidities impact individuals' quality of life. For instance, children with DCD and ADHD face compounded challenges in academic and social settings, which can have significant long-term implications for their well-being and success (Chen & Tseng, 2020).

In conclusion, ongoing research into motor disorders broadens our understanding of these conditions, revealing nuanced insights into their etiology, presentation, and best treatment approaches.

Treatment and Interventions

The treatment and interventions for motor disorders are multifaceted and tailored to meet the unique needs of individuals affected by these conditions. Here is an overview of interventions based on recent literature:

Treatments for Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD):

• Occupational and Physical Therapy: These therapies remain primary treatment modalities. Occupational therapists work with children to improve their fine motor skills necessary for tasks like writing, while physical therapists focus on gross motor skills related to walking, running, and jumping (Missiuna et al., 2008). Task-specific interventions, where the child repeatedly practices a specific skill, have shown promise (Sugden & Chambers, 2007).
• Perceptual Motor Training: This focuses on improving the integration of perceptual and motor skills. It might include activities that combine visual or auditory perceptions with motor actions (Zwicker et al., 2012).

Treatments for Stereotypic Movement Disorder:

• Behavioral Interventions: This includes techniques such as differential reinforcement of other behaviors (DRO), where children are rewarded for periods during which they do not exhibit the stereotypic behavior (Rojahn et al., 2008).
• Environmental Modifications: Changing the environment to reduce triggers or providing sensory alternatives can help reduce the occurrence of these behaviors (Matson et al., 2009).

Treatments for Tic Disorders:

• Comprehensive Behavioral Intervention for Tics (CBIT): This has become one of the mainstays of non-pharmacological intervention. CBIT combines habit reversal training, where individuals learn to recognize the urge to tic and replace the tic with another behavior, with strategies to manage situations that worsen tics (Piacentini et al., 2010).
• Medications: While not always necessary, medications can be helpful, especially for those with severe tics. Neuroleptics, like risperidone or haloperidol, are often prescribed but have potential side effects (Pringsheim et al., 2019).

Across all motor disorders, interventions should ideally be multidisciplinary, involving educational professionals, occupational therapists, physical therapists, psychologists, and, where necessary, physicians. Furthermore, psychoeducation and support for families are crucial as they play an essential role in the management and adaptation strategies for these disorders.

Implications if Untreated

When left untreated, motor disorders can significantly affect an individual's cognitive, social, emotional, and physical development. Here is a summary of potential repercussions:

Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) often struggle with tasks that require motor precision, such as writing, leading to academic underachievement. These challenges can compromise their confidence in educational settings and influence their choices regarding higher education and vocation (Alloway & Temple, 2007).

Motor disorders can have profound social consequences. Children with DCD, for instance, often feel left out of peer activities that involve motor skills, leading to feelings of isolation. Over time, these feelings can give rise to social anxiety and withdrawal (Smyth & Anderson, 2000).

Due to continuous failures in tasks that their peers easily accomplish, children with motor disorders may develop low self-esteem and a diminished sense of self-worth. This can further predispose them to mood disorders like depression and anxiety (Cairney et al., 2013).

Children with motor disorders are often less involved in physical activities. This reduced engagement can lead to various health problems, including obesity, reduced cardiovascular health, and poor overall physical fitness (Rivilis et al., 2011).

Because of impaired coordination, individuals with DCD may have a heightened risk of injury in sports settings and daily activities. This recurrent injury pattern can further discourage participation in physical activities (Missiuna et al., 2006).

If untreated, the challenges faced in childhood may persist into adulthood, affecting career choices, daily functioning, and overall quality of life. Adults with untreated motor disorders might avoid certain professions or activities that demand motor skills, limiting their life opportunities (Kirby et al., 2010).

Timely identification and intervention are crucial for motor disorders to prevent the cascade of adverse outcomes that might ensue. Although primarily motor, these disorders have implications that span various life domains, reinforcing the need for holistic management.

Summary

Motor disorders, especially Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), have been subjects of debate and controversy over the years. The very nature of DCD, which can manifest in a wide range of symptoms and severities, has led to challenges in consistent diagnosis and recognition. Some professionals have hesitated to label children with motor difficulties, fearing the potential stigma or misunderstanding attached to such a diagnosis (Blank et al., 2019).

Historically, children with DCD were often dismissed as merely being "clumsy" or "awkward" without a deeper understanding of the underlying neurological and developmental issues at play (Wilson et al., 2017). Moreover, concerns about the overlap of DCD symptoms with other conditions led to potential misdiagnoses or dual diagnoses, further muddying the waters (Goulardins et al., 2015).

However, understanding motor disorders has evolved with advancements in neuroscience and diagnostic tools. Modern research has provided clearer evidence of the brain-based origins of conditions like DCD, moving away from earlier notions that the disorder was simply a result of laziness or a lack of effort on the child's part (Biotteau et al., 2016).

DCD and other motor disorders are increasingly recognized in medical and educational communities today. This recognition has been reflected in the inclusion and refined criteria for DCD in major diagnostic manuals, such as the DSM-5. Establishing global initiatives and networks, like the International Clinical Practice Recommendations for DCD, has also played a role in standardizing understanding and intervention strategies for the disorder.

Nevertheless, while strides have been made, challenges remain. Continuing research, education, and advocacy are essential to ensure that individuals with motor disorders receive the understanding, support, and interventions they require to thrive.

References

Alloway, T. P., & Temple, K. J. (2007). A comparison of working memory skills and learning in children with developmental coordination disorder and moderate learning difficulties. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 473-487.

Biotteau, M., Chaix, Y., & Blais, M. (2016). Neural signature of DCD: A critical review of MRI neuroimaging studies. Frontiers in Neurology, 7, 227.

Blank, R., Smits-Engelsman, B., Polatajko, H., & Wilson, P. (2012). European Academy for Childhood Disability (EACD): Recommendations on the definition, diagnosis and intervention of developmental coordination disorder (long version). Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 54(1), 54-93.

Bodfish, J. W., Symons, F. J., Parker, D. E., & Lewis, M. H. (2000). Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: Comparisons to mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 237-243.

Caçola, P. (2016). Physical and mental health of children with developmental coordination disorder. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 224.

Cairney, J., Hay, J. A., Faught, B. E., & Hawes, R. (2005). Developmental coordination disorder and overweight and obesity in children aged 9-14 y. International Journal of Obesity, 29(4), 369-372.

Cairney, J., Rigoli, D., & Piek, J. (2013). Developmental coordination disorder and internalizing problems in children: The environmental stress hypothesis elaborated. Developmental Review, 33(3), 224-238.

Chen, Y. L., & Tseng, W. Y. (2020). The role of attention in children with developmental coordination disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 42(6), 582-592.

Cohen, D. J., & Leckman, J. F. (1999). Tourette’s Syndrome: Tic Disorders and ADHD. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, 21, 113-148.

Freeman, R. D., Fast, D. K., Burd, L., Kerbeshian, J., Robertson, M. M., & Sandor, P. (2000). An international perspective on Tourette syndrome: selected findings from 3,500 individuals in 22 countries. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 42(7), 436-447.

Goulardins, J. B., Rigoli, D., Loh, P. R., Kane, R., Licari, M., Hands, B., ... & Piek, J. P. (2015). The relationship between motor skills, ADHD symptoms, and childhood body weight. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 43, 134-143.

Goyen, T. A., & Lui, K. (2009). Developmental coordination disorder in "apparently normal" schoolchildren born extremely preterm. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 94(4), 298-302.

Jones, L., Goldsmith, L., & Hewitt, O. (2021). Environmental influences on the onset and persistence of stereotypic movement disorder in children. Child Development, 92(2), 687-701.

Kadesjö, B., & Gillberg, C. (1999). Developmental coordination disorder in Swedish 7-year-old children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(7), 820-828.

Kirby, A., Edwards, L., Sugden, D., & Rosenblum, S. (2010). The development and standardization of the adult developmental co-ordination disorders/dyspraxia checklist (ADC). Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(1), 131-139.

Kirby, A., Sugden, D., & Beveridge, S. (2008). The identification and assessment of young children with movement difficulties. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(1), 61-73.

Langevin, L. M., MacMaster, F. P., & Dewey, D. (2019). Distinct patterns of white matter and functional connectivity abnormalities in children with primary monosymptomatic nocturnal enuresis and developmental coordination disorder. NeuroImage: Clinical, 24, 101941.

Leckman, J. F., Zhang, H., Vitale, A., Lahnin, F., Lynch, K., Bondi, C., ... & Peterson, B. S. (1997). Course of tic severity in Tourette syndrome: the first two decades. Pediatrics, 100(2), 226-236.

Martin, N. C., Piek, J. P., & Hay, D. (2006). DCD and ADHD: A genetic study of their shared aetiology. Human Movement Science, 25(1), 110-124.

Mathews, C. A., Bimson, B., Lowe, T. L., Herrera, L. D., Budman, C. L., Erenberg, G., ... & Freimer, N. B. (2006). Association between maternal smoking and increased symptom severity in Tourette's syndrome. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(6), 1066-1073.

Matson, J. L., LoVullo, S. V., Rivet, T. T., & Boisjoli, J. A. (2009). Validity of the autism spectrum disorder-comorbid for children (ASD-CC). Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(2), 345-357.

McGuire, J. F., Piacentini, J., & Storch, E. A. (2020). An overview of behavioral interventions for tic disorders. Behavior Therapy, 51(2), 243-257.

Missiuna, C., Moll, S., King, G., King, S., & Law, M. (2008). A trajectory of troubles: Parents' impressions of the impact of developmental coordination disorder. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 28(1), 81-101.

Missiuna, C., Moll, S., King, G., Stewart, D., & MacDonald, K. (2006). Life experiences of young adults who have coordination difficulties. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(3), 151-163.

Pauls, D. L., Fernandez, T. V., Mathews, C. A., State, M. W., & Scharf, J. M. (2014). The inheritance of Tourette disorder: A review. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 3(4), 380-385.

Peterson, B. S., Staib, L., Scahill, L., Zhang, H., Anderson, C., Leckman, J. F., ... & Gore, J. C. (2003). Regional brain and ventricular volumes in Tourette syndrome. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(5), 415-424.

Piacentini, J., Woods, D. W., Scahill, L., Wilhelm, S., Peterson, A. L., Chang, S., ... & Walkup, J. T. (2010). Behavior therapy for children with Tourette disorder: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 303(19), 1929-1937.

Poulsen, A. A., Ziviani, J. M., & Cuskelly, M. (2007). Perceived freedom in leisure and physical co-ordination ability: Impact on out-of-school activity participation and life satisfaction. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33(4), 432-440.

Pringsheim, T., Okun, M. S., Müller-Vahl, K., Martino, D., Jankovic, J., Cavanna, A. E., ... & Kano, Y. (2019). Practice guideline recommendations summary: Treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology, 92(19), 896-906.

Rivilis, I., Hay, J., Cairney, J., Klentrou, P., Liu, J., & Faught, B. E. (2011). Physical activity and fitness in children with developmental coordination disorder: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 894-910.

Robertson, M. M. (2008). The prevalence and epidemiology of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Part 1: the epidemiological and prevalence studies. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 65(5), 461-472.

Rojahn, J., Matlock, S. T., & Tassé, M. J. (2008). The stereotyped behavior scale: Psychometric analyses with infants and toddlers with developmental delays. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29(3), 206-217.

Rosenblum, S. (2006). The development and standardization of the children activity scales (ChAS-P/T) for the early identification of children with developmental coordination disorders. Child: Care, Health and Development, 32(6), 619-631.

Sigurdsson, E., Eiriksdottir, V. H., & Gunnarsdottir, T. (2002). Emotional and behavioral problems in children with motor coordination difficulties. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 56(1), 39-43.

Smith, L., Thomas, P., & Peper, C. L. (2021). Exploring gender differences in developmental coordination disorder: Emerging trends and future research directions. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 8(2), 84-92.

Smyth, M. M., & Anderson, H. I. (2000). Coping with clumsiness in the school playground: Social and physical play in children with coordination impairments. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18(3), 389-413.

Storch, E. A., Murphy, T. K., Geffken, G. R., Sajid, M., Allen, P., Roberti, J. W., & Goodman, W. K. (2007). Reliability and validity of the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 486-491.

Sugden, D., & Chambers, M. (2007). Intervention in children with developmental coordination disorder: the role of parents and teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 747-760.

Swedo, S. E., Leonard, H. L., Garvey, M., Mittleman, B., Allen, A. J., Perlmutter, S., ... & Dubbert, B. K. (1998). Pediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infections: Clinical description of the first 50 cases. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 155(2), 264-271.

Tan, A., Salgado, M., & Fahn, S. (2011). The characterization and outcome of stereotypical movements in non-autistic children. Movement Disorders, 26(3), 436-440.

Thomsen, P. H. (2016). Stereotypic movement disorder: easily missed. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 58(8), 815-819.

Wilson, P. H., Ruddock, S., Smits-Engelsman, B., Polatajko, H., & Blank, R. (2017). Understanding performance deficits in developmental coordination disorder: a meta-analysis of recent research. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 59(3), 257-267.

Zwicker, J. G., Missiuna, C., Harris, S. R., & Boyd, L. A. (2012). Developmental coordination disorder: A review and update. European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 16(6), 573-581.