Adjustment disorders are emotional or behavioral reactions that arise in response to identifiable life stressors. These reactions are clinically significant, surpassing the typical expectations given the stressor or leading to substantial impairment in areas like social and occupational functioning.

A significant life event often triggers the development of an adjustment disorder. This could be a singular occurrence, such as the unexpected loss of a job or the breakup of a relationship. It could also stem from multiple events like simultaneous business and marital challenges. While these stressors can range from dramatic to seemingly minor, they invariably profoundly impact the individual's emotional well-being.

Individuals grappling with adjustment disorders display a myriad of symptoms. Emotionally, they might feel overwhelmed by sadness or hopelessness and often break into spontaneous crying spells. Behavior tendencies include acting rebelliously, avoiding social interactions, or underperforming at work or in academic settings. It is essential to underscore that these symptoms typically manifest within three months following the stressor's onset. They usually wane within six months, primarily if the stressor has been addressed or resolved. However, if the stressor becomes chronic, the disorder might persist.

The DSM-5 delineates specific subtypes of adjustment disorders based on primary symptoms:

• Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood: This is marked by symptoms like overwhelming sadness or a pervading sense of hopelessness.
• Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety: Dominant symptoms comprise nervousness or excessive worrying. In children, this could manifest as separation anxiety.
• Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood blends depressive and anxious symptoms.
• Adjustment Disorder with Disturbance of Conduct: Behavioral symptoms take precedence, often translating to violating others' rights or societal norms.
• Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct encompasses emotional symptoms (like anxiety) and discernible behavioral issues.
• Adjustment Disorder Unspecified: This category captures responses to stressors that do not align with the categories mentioned above.

Despite the seemingly exaggerated response to the stressor, the distress in adjustment disorders is palpable. It is not a mere psychological construct nor something they can merely dismiss. The symptoms lead to significant distress, affecting social or occupational functions.

It is crucial to differentiate adjustment disorders from other psychological conditions. The symptoms should not be an escalation of a pre-existing disorder, nor should they align with the criteria of another mental health condition. Individuals with adjustment disorders exhibit various emotional or behavioral symptoms that diverge in severity based on the nature of the stressor and their coping mechanisms. The critical hallmark remains the temporal connection with a particular stressor and the disproportionate psychological response.

Diagnostic Criteria

Adjustment disorders (AD) encompass a range of emotional and behavioral reactions that manifest in response to identifiable stressors. These reactions are crucially significant as they tend to be more intense than typically expected from the stressor or result in notable impairment in social or occupational areas (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013).

Emerging evidence has clarified the temporal relationship between the onset of the stressor and the emergence of symptoms. The DSM-5 posits that symptoms typically appear within three months of the stressor's start and diminish within six months after the stressor or its consequences have concluded (APA, 2013). Studies have found that the disorder might endure if the stressor persists or its ramifications become chronic (Maercker et al., 2013).

In classifying AD, the DSM-5 has detailed specific subtypes based on predominant symptoms (APA, 2013). These include AD with depressed mood, with anxiety, with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, with disturbance of conduct, with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, and unspecified (Casey, 2014). Each subtype offers a nuanced understanding of the predominant emotional or behavioral presentations, ensuring clinicians can offer targeted interventions. Here is a review of the specific subtypes and their diagnostic criteria:

Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood:

• The individual primarily presents with symptoms like sadness, tearfulness, and feelings of hopelessness. This subtype is characterized by depressive symptoms that arise in direct response to the stressor.

Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety:

• The predominant symptoms for this subtype revolve around anxiety. Examples include excessive worrying, restlessness, and feeling overwhelmed or out of control. Separation anxiety from primary caregivers or loved ones might be a significant symptom for children and adolescents.

Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood:

• As the name suggests, individuals diagnosed with this subtype exhibit depressive and anxious symptoms. Neither set of symptoms predominates, and their combined presentation is significant enough to warrant clinical attention.

Adjustment Disorder with Disturbance of Conduct:

• Behavioral disturbances characterize this subtype. The individual might violate societal norms or the rights of others, such as getting into fights, vandalizing property, or engaging in reckless behavior. The behavior directly results from the stressor and is inconsistent with the individual's usual behavior or societal norms.

Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct:

• Individuals diagnosed with this subtype show both emotional and behavioral disturbances. This means they might exhibit symptoms of depression or anxiety alongside behavioral issues like violating societal rules or the rights of others.

Adjustment Disorder Unspecified (previously known as Adjustment Disorder with Unspecified Disturbance of Emotions or Conduct):

• This subtype is utilized when the reaction to the stressor does not fit the categories outlined above. The maladaptive response might involve physical complaints, social withdrawal, or other behaviors that do not neatly categorize into depressed mood, anxiety, or conduct disturbances.

It is essential to note that the core criterion that remains consistent across all these subtypes is the temporal relationship with an identifiable stressor. This means the symptoms begin within three months of the stressor's occurrence and typically do not last more than six months after the stressor or its consequences have concluded unless the stressor has enduring consequences (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

The distinctiveness of AD from other psychological disorders is vital. For an accurate diagnosis, the observed symptoms should neither exacerbate a pre-existing disorder nor meet the criteria for another mental health condition (Strain & Diefenbacher, 2008).

The Impacts

Emotionally, individuals with AD often grapple with feelings of hopelessness, sadness, anxiety, and overwhelm. This emotional turmoil can severely impact their ability to cope with daily life, reducing their overall quality of life (Bachem & Maercker, 2016). In many cases, emotional distress can be as severe as that experienced in more chronic mental health disorders like major depressive disorder or generalized anxiety disorder (Zelviene & Kazlauskas, 2018).

Behaviorally, these individuals might exhibit recklessness, impulsiveness, or even aggression, especially in subtypes where disturbances of conduct are prominent (Casey, 2014). Such behaviors can further estrange them from their communities and loved ones, aggravating feelings of isolation.

From a social perspective, individuals with AD might withdraw from social engagements and responsibilities, leading to isolation (Strain et al., 2018). This can exacerbate feelings of loneliness, further entrenching their emotional distress. Interpersonal relationships, especially intimate ones, can be significantly strained, with heightened conflict and decreased satisfaction reported (Bachem & Maercker, 2016).

Occupationally, AD has been linked to reduced productivity, frequent absenteeism, and increased risk of job loss (Kocalevent et al., 2013). The resultant economic strain can introduce or worsen existing financial stressors, further complicating the individual's situation.

Significantly, untreated AD can increase the risk for the subsequent development of more chronic mental health conditions, underscoring the necessity for early detection and intervention (Zelviene & Kazlauskas, 2018).

The Etiology (Origins and Causes)

Adjustment Disorders (AD) etiology involves individual vulnerability factors and external stressors. At the core of AD lies the presence of identifiable stressors. These stressors can be single events, such as losing a loved one, undergoing a medical procedure, or experiencing a significant life change like divorce (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). They can also be continuous or recurring stressors, such as ongoing financial difficulties, chronic illness, or continuous exposure to conflict (Casey, 2014).

However, not everyone exposed to these stressors develops AD, indicating the presence of individual vulnerability factors. These include previous life experiences, coping skills, resilience, genetic predispositions, and other mental health conditions (Bachem & Maercker, 2016). For instance, individuals with a history of trauma or those with poor coping mechanisms might be more susceptible to AD when faced with significant stressors (Zelviene & Kazlauskas, 2018).

Research has shown that certain neurobiological factors might play a role in the etiology of AD. Abnormalities in stress-response systems, such as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, can make specific individuals more prone to developing AD when faced with stressors (Maercker et al., 2012).

Cultural and societal factors also influence the etiology. How a society or culture perceives and reacts to specific stressors and the coping mechanisms they endorse can either shield from or exacerbate the risk of AD (Strain et al., 2018). For instance, in societies where expressing emotions is stigmatized, individuals might be more at risk due to suppressed emotional reactions.

Comorbidities

Adjustment Disorders (AD) often do not occur in isolation. Many individuals with AD simultaneously experience other mental health conditions called comorbidities. Understanding these comorbidities is crucial, as they can influence AD's onset, course, and treatment response. These are some of the critical comorbidities commonly associated with Adjustment Disorders.

Depressive Disorders: Individuals with AD frequently present comorbid depressive symptoms. Particularly in cases where the primary subtype is Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, there is a heightened risk for comorbidity with Major Depressive Disorder or Persistent Depressive Disorder (Dysthymia). It is paramount to discern whether depressive symptoms arise directly from the stressor, as this leans toward an AD diagnosis rather than an independent depressive disorder (Strain & Diefenbacher, 2008). Research has highlighted that individuals diagnosed with AD often present with depressive symptoms comparable to those with Major Depressive Disorder. Bachem and Maercker (2016) emphasized the importance of differentiating between depressive symptoms arising purely from the stressor and those indicative of a more pervasive depressive disorder, as this distinction guides treatment planning.

Anxiety Disorders: Given that anxiety can be a predominant symptom in some forms of AD, it is unsurprising that comorbidity with generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and other anxiety disorders is common. This overlap underscores the need for precise diagnostic procedures to ensure appropriate treatment (Zelviene & Kazlauskas, 2018). Anxiety symptoms in AD have garnered attention because of their potential overlap with conditions like generalized anxiety disorder. Zelviene and Kazlauskas (2018) highlighted the nuances of anxiety presentations in AD and the importance of precise diagnostic procedures to ensure individuals receive targeted interventions.

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Stressors with traumatic qualities can blur the distinctions between PTSD and AD. Though there is symptom overlap, PTSD possesses specific criteria centered around trauma exposure and subsequent responses. It is crucial to distinguish between the two, as treatment approaches differ (Maercker & Horn, 2013). The distinction between AD and PTSD, especially when the stressor is traumatic, has been a significant point of discussion in the literature. Maercker and Horn (2013) pointed out that while symptom overlap exists, there are distinct diagnostic criteria for each, emphasizing the need for accurate diagnosis to guide therapeutic interventions.

Substance Use Disorders: The emotional strain from AD might drive individuals to alcohol, drugs, or other substances as coping mechanisms. This self-medication behavior, if persistent, can lead to Substance Use Disorders, further complicating their mental health landscape (Casey, 2014). The relationship between emotional distress from AD and substance use has been explored, with findings indicating a propensity for individuals with AD to resort to substance use as a coping mechanism. Casey (2014) highlighted that this behavior, when chronic, can lead to the development of Substance Use Disorders, adding another layer of complexity to the treatment landscape.

Personality Disorders: Certain personality disorders, notably Borderline Personality Disorder, might heighten vulnerability to AD due to inherent challenges with emotional regulation. Such individuals are prone to intense and fluctuating emotional states, making them more susceptible to AD in stressful scenarios (Zimmerman et al., 2019). The interplay between personality traits and AD has been a topic of investigation. Zimmerman, Rothschild, and Chelminski (2019) examined the vulnerability of individuals with certain personality disorders, especially Borderline Personality Disorder, to AD. Their findings suggested that inherent challenges with emotional regulation in these populations might enhance susceptibility to AD under stress.

Somatoform Disorders: In some individuals, the emotional and psychological distress from AD manifests as physical symptoms. This presentation can lead to concurrently diagnosing somatic disorders like Somatic Symptom Disorder or Illness Anxiety Disorder. These disorders are characterized by significant focus and anxiety about physical symptoms that might be hard to explain (Strain & Diefenbacher, 2008) medically. Strain and Diefenbacher (2008) delved into the manifestation of emotional and psychological distress from AD as physical symptoms. They found potential overlap with conditions like Somatic Symptom Disorder, emphasizing the intricate relationship between emotional distress and physical symptomatology.

Risk Factors

Adjustment Disorders (AD) manifest as a maladaptive emotional or behavioral reaction to identifiable stressors. While everyone encounters stressors at various junctures, not everyone develops AD. This discrepancy underscores the significance of specific risk factors that amplify vulnerability. Understanding these risk factors provides a comprehensive view of the etiological underpinnings of AD and assists in effective prevention and intervention strategies. These are the common risk factors:

• Life Events: While exposure to significant life stressors is inherent to AD's definition, the magnitude, duration, and nature of these events can vary widely. For example, chronic stressors such as ongoing marital discord may predispose someone to AD just as acutely as sudden, intense events like unexpected job loss (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013).
• Previous Mental Health Conditions: An individual's mental health history is pivotal in susceptibility. For instance, those with a history of mood disorders have a heightened emotional response system that might be easily perturbed by additional stressors (Casey, 2014).
• Poor Coping Skills: Coping strategies act as a mediator between stress and its psychological outcomes. Relying on avoidance, denial, or substance use, rather than adaptive strategies like problem-solving or seeking social support, can exacerbate stress reactions and contribute to AD's onset (Bachem & Maercker, 2016).
• Lack of Social Support: The protective effect of a robust social network is well-documented in mental health literature. The absence of this protective buffer, or being in a conflicting or isolating social environment, can heighten the psychological impact of stressors, making the individual more prone to AD (Zelviene & Kazlauskas, 2018).
• Childhood Adversities: Early-life traumatic experiences can mold the brain's stress-response mechanisms. Those who have faced childhood adversities, such as trauma or neglect, might have a sensitized stress-response system, making them more vulnerable to AD when encountering subsequent stressors (Maercker & Horn, 2013).
• Other Vulnerabilities: Personality factors significantly influence one's reaction to stress. Traits like neuroticism, characterized by emotional instability, can predispose individuals to more intense and prolonged reactions to stressors. Additionally, individuals exposed to continuous stress, be it occupational or personal, face a cumulative risk where the consistent exposure amplifies their vulnerability to AD (Zimmerman et al., 2019).

Case Study

Patient Profile: Robert Thompson, a dedicated 52-year-old high school mathematics teacher, finds himself at a crossroads in life. For nearly three decades, Robert's identity was intertwined with two significant roles: an educator and a family man. However, recent life events have disrupted this sense of self, leading him to seek professional help.

Presenting Issue: Robert noticed a tangible shift in his demeanor and mood six months before seeking assistance. He candidly felt detached from the person he once knew himself to be. Symptoms included a stark decline in motivation—unusual for the once passionate teacher—frequent episodes of tearfulness, disrupted sleep patterns, and a looming sense of sadness that he could not shake off.

Background: Teaching high school mathematics was not just a job for Robert but a vocation. His dedication to his students remained unwavering for 28 years. However, two significant personal events had recently transpired. First, after a quarter-century of marriage, he underwent a challenging divorce. Then, his youngest child, with whom he shared a close bond, departed for college. This departure marked the beginning of Robert's empty nest phase—a quiet house devoid of the familial chatter he was accustomed to. He openly shared feelings of profound loneliness, which intensified in the echoing silence of his now too-spacious home.

Clinical Assessment: Probing deeper into Robert's emotional state, it became evident that he felt overwhelmed by the cascade of changes that unfolded relatively quickly. His once routine-driven life felt out of sync. Concentration at work waned, irritability spiked, and Robert, the man who was once the heart of familial weekend activities, now found solace in the confines of his home, often avoiding external interactions. Although he cognitively linked the onset of these feelings to his son's departure, the emotional quagmire he found himself in seemed inescapable.

Diagnosis: Drawing connections between Robert's emotional and behavioral responses and the significant life transitions he underwent, a diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood was posited. The culmination of the emotional toll from the divorce and the amplified silence of his empty nest were pinpointed as the stressors triggering his symptoms.

Treatment: A holistic approach to Robert's healing was envisioned:

• Individual Psychotherapy: A structured Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) approach was employed. This would assist Robert in dismantling and rebuilding his thought patterns, fostering resilience and adaptive coping.
• Group Therapy: Recognizing the therapeutic potential of shared experiences, Robert was introduced to a support group catering to individuals navigating the aftermath of divorce.
• Lifestyle Interventions: To combat feelings of isolation, Robert was gently nudged to revisit past hobbies. Suggestions included community-centric activities, such as joining local classes or clubs, to rebuild his social circle.

Progress and Outcome: As weeks transitioned into months, a visible shift in Robert's demeanor was observed. The support group sessions, in particular, resonated with him, offering a platform to vocalize his feelings and an avenue to forge new social bonds. Robert slowly reconstructed his social landscape by rekindling his love for gardening and immersing himself in a local book club. This multi-faceted approach addressed his immediate symptoms and equipped him with strategies to counter potential future emotional challenges.

Conclusion: Robert Thompson's journey accentuates the significance of context in understanding mental health dynamics. It is a testament that with timely and tailored interventions, individuals can successfully navigate life's tumultuous transitions and rediscover their equilibrium.

Recent Psychology Research Findings

Adjustment Disorders (AD) have consistently garnered attention in psychological research. This focus is driven by the disorder's ubiquitous nature, affecting a vast swath of the population across different life stages and in response to varying stressors. While AD has been recognized for some time in clinical settings, the precise underpinnings, course, and best treatment approaches remain areas of active investigation. Recent research has shed light on several facets of AD, from its course and socio-interpersonal factors to its relation with traumatic stress and potential neurobiological bases. Let us delve into these recent findings to understand Adjustment Disorders better.

A study by Bachem and Maercker (2016) offered insights into the nature and course of adjustment disorders. Their research proved that AD often has a chronic course, challenging the belief that AD is transient and short-lived. This new understanding underscores the significance of early intervention to prevent prolonged distress.

Maercker and Horn (2013) introduced a socio-interpersonal perspective on AD, emphasizing that the disorder is not just an individual's reaction to stressors but is also influenced by interpersonal processes. This perspective stresses the importance of understanding a person's social context and the role of interpersonal relationships in the onset, course, and recovery from AD.

O'Donnell et al. (2020) explored the relationship between traumatic stress and AD. Their findings indicated that individuals who have experienced traumatic events but do not exhibit the full spectrum of PTSD symptoms may still develop AD. This insight calls for a broader perspective when assessing trauma survivors, ensuring that those with AD receive appropriate care even if they do not fit the strict criteria for PTSD.

Research by Perkonigg et al. (2019) delved into the potential neurobiological underpinnings of AD. Their study suggested that there might be distinct neural pathways associated with AD, emphasizing the importance of further research into the neurobiology of the disorder. This understanding could eventually guide the development of targeted therapeutic interventions.

Treatment and Interventions

Adjustment Disorders (AD) represent a unique category of stress-related conditions characterized by emotional or behavioral symptoms arising from identifiable stressors. Given the diverse nature of potential stressors - from personal losses to significant life changes - treatment for AD must be individualized, multifaceted, and holistic. Successful interventions often combine therapeutic, pharmacological, and psychoeducational elements tailored to address the symptoms and the underlying stressors. As researchers and clinicians have delved deeper into understanding AD, a repertoire of evidence-based treatments has emerged, offering hope and healing for those affected. Herein, we will explore the primary modalities and interventions that have shown efficacy in treating Adjustment Disorders.

• Psychotherapy: Often considered the first line of treatment for AD, individual psychotherapy provides an environment for patients to express and process their emotions. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a frequently employed modality where patients learn to identify and challenge negative thought patterns and develop adaptive coping strategies. Research has shown CBT can reduce symptoms and prevent AD's chronicity (Zelviene & Kazlauskas, 2018).
• Group Therapy: Group therapy offers individuals a platform to share experiences and garner support from others undergoing similar life challenges. This approach promotes mutual understanding and helps normalize and contextualize individual experiences (Bachem & Maercker, 2016).
• Medication: While psychotherapy remains primary, specific symptoms of AD, especially pronounced anxiety or depressive symptoms, may be managed with medications like antidepressants or anxiolytics. It is crucial to note that medication is often seen as an adjunctive treatment rather than a primary one (Casey, 2014).
• Stress Management Techniques: Incorporating relaxation techniques, such as deep breathing exercises, progressive muscle relaxation, and mindfulness practices, can be beneficial. These methods equip individuals with tools to handle stress more effectively, alleviating AD symptoms (Maercker & Horn, 2013).
• Family Therapy: Given that interpersonal issues or changes (e.g., divorce, relocation) can often precipitate AD, involving the family in therapy can address broader dynamics and improve familial support. This holistic approach ensures that the family becomes a constructive environment for recovery (Strain & Diefenbacher, 2008).

Implications if Untreated

The decision to forgo treatment for Adjustment Disorders can have profound and far-reaching consequences, encompassing emotional, social, occupational, and physical domains.

AD's initial emotional and behavioral manifestations can become entrenched without timely intervention, evolving from transient responses to stressors into chronic, debilitating conditions. The persistence of these symptoms can serve as a fertile ground for the emergence of more severe mental health conditions. For instance, untreated AD might escalate into major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, or substance dependence as individuals might resort to self-medication as a coping mechanism (Casey, 2014).

From an interpersonal perspective, AD can strain relationships, leading to increased feelings of isolation. Affected individuals may withdraw from their social circles, causing a deterioration of vital support systems. This emotional turmoil can extend into the workplace, manifesting as reduced concentration, increased irritability, or absenteeism. Such disruptions can have cascading effects on job stability and potential career advancements (Strain & Diefenbacher, 2008).

The ramifications of untreated AD are not restricted to mental health alone. The sustained stress and emotional unrest can precipitate various physical ailments, ranging from sleep disturbances to a weakened immune response. In more severe cases, the unrelenting distress might push individuals toward thoughts of self-harm or even suicide. These factors can dramatically diminish an individual's overall quality of life, casting shadows over their happiness, contentment, and general well-being (Maercker & Horn, 2013).

Summary

Adjustment Disorders (AD) refer to individuals' maladaptive emotional or behavioral reactions in response to identifiable stressors. The diagnosis becomes intricate due to its symptoms' broad and sometimes nebulous nature, which can overlap with those of many other psychiatric conditions.

The diagnostic overlap is one of the most significant challenges when identifying AD. For instance, the emotional distress characteristic of AD can resemble symptoms of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, or even post-traumatic stress disorder, especially when the inciting stressor is traumatic. Distinguishing AD from these disorders requires careful assessment of symptoms' onset, duration, and direct relationship to specific stressors. Typically, AD symptoms arise within three months of the stressor's occurrence and do not last for more than six months after the stressor or its consequences have ceased. If they persist, clinicians must re-evaluate the diagnosis.

Teasing AD apart from related disorders requires a keen understanding of the context. Clinicians must often explore whether the emotional and behavioral reactions are proportionate to the stressor and culturally appropriate. For example, grief following the loss of a loved one may manifest similarly to AD but is a natural response unless it becomes prolonged or unusually severe.

Emotional regulation is a cornerstone concept in the understanding and treatment of AD. The disorder often stems from the individual's inability to effectively process or manage the intense emotions a stressor evokes. Those with pre-existing difficulties in emotional regulation might be more susceptible to developing AD when faced with significant life changes or stressors. In the context of recovery, enhancing emotional regulation skills can be pivotal. Techniques that foster self-awareness, resilience, and adaptive coping can help individuals navigate their emotions more effectively, accelerating the healing process and reducing the risk of recurrence.

In sum, Adjustment Disorders, while clearly defined in diagnostic criteria, present a clinical challenge due to their overlap with other conditions. A nuanced understanding of emotional regulation and the individual's broader context is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.

References

Bachem, R., & Maercker, A. (2016). Developmental and contextual factors in the role of severe life events on two types of onset in adjustment disorders. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 7(1), 32066.

Casey, P. (2014). Adjustment disorder: New developments. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(6), 451.

Kocalevent, R. D., Mierke, A., Danzer, G., & Klapp, B. F. (2013). Adjustment disorders as stress response syndromes: A new diagnostic concept and its exploration in a medical sample. Psychopathology, 46(3), 152-160.

Maercker, A., & Horn, A. B. (2013). A socio-interpersonal perspective on PTSD: The case for environments and interpersonal processes. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 20(6), 465-481.

Maercker, A., Brewin, C. R., Bryant, R. A., Cloitre, M., Reed, G. M., van Ommeren, M., ... & Saxena, S. (2013). Proposals for mental disorders specifically associated with stress in the International Classification of Diseases-11. The Lancet, 381(9878), 1683-1685.

Maercker, A., Forstmeier, S., Pielmaier, L., Spangenberg, L., Brahler, E., & Glaesmer, H. (2012). Adjustment disorders: Prevalence in a representative nationwide survey in Germany. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47(11), 1745-1752.

O'Donnell, M. L., Alkemade, N., Creamer, M., McFarlane, A. C., Silove, D., Bryant, R. A., ... & Forbes, D. (2020). The long-term psychiatric sequelae of severe injury: A 6-year follow-up study. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 81(2).

Perkonigg, A., Pfaltz, M. C., Stein, D. J., Höfler, M., Lieb, R., Maercker, A., & Wittchen, H. U. (2019). The natural course of PTSD in conflict-affected regions: 11-year follow-up of a epidemiological study. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 54(2), 259-269.

Strain, J. J., & Diefenbacher, A. (2008). The adjustment disorders: The conundrums of the diagnoses. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49(2), 121-130.

Strain, J. J., Diefenbacher, A., & Michael, B. (2018). The adjustment disorders: The conundrums of the diagnosis. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 49(2), 121-130.

Zelviene, P., & Kazlauskas, E. (2018). Adjustment disorder: Current perspectives. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 14, 375-381.

Zimmerman, M., Rothschild, L., & Chelminski, I. (2019). The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(10), 1911-1918.